Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Madison Brengle vs Maria Camila Osorio Serrano Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brengle vs Serrano analysis and find out who is favored!
Madison Brengle vs Maria Camila Osorio Serrano Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Brengle 1 - 0 Serrano
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brengle has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Serrano has won 41.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brengle, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Serrano has won 58.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 41.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brengle has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Serrano has saved 50.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brengle has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 14/ 12), with Serrano winning 59.62% (W/L 31/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brengle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 340/ 236), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 45/ 45). Serrano has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 110/ 46), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Brengle has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 11/ 6), where as Serrano has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Brengle winning 1 times and Serrano being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Brengle winning 2 and Serrano winning 0. The last match between Brengle and Serrano was at the French Open - Paris, 31-05-2021, First, Clay with Madison Brengle getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brengle and Serrano have played a deciding set 0 times, with Brengle winning 0 times and Serrano 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Brengle winning 0, and Serrano 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brengle has played against opponents with an average rank of 159.69 while Serrano has played against players with an average rank of 114.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brengle has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Serrano has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brengle has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Serrano has converted 54.8% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
259
Rank
35
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
81
Rank
33
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
56% (556-436)
Career Total W/L
64% (193-110)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
63% (17-10)
$2,482,006
Career Prize Money
$1,293,182
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Madison Brengle | Maria Camila Osorio Serrano |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (50/70) | 65% (44/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (26/50) | 50% (22/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (7/20) | 21% (5/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (8/14) | 75% (6/8) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (41/68) | 53% (37/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Madison Brengle
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
10
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
53%
(
37 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Madison Brengle | Maria Camila Osorio Serrano |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (17/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (38/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (311/295) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (11/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.47 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 138 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:46:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 97.85 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1339/2005) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (788/1339) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (278/666) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 55% (137/250) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (933/1946) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (10/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (14/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 40% (15/6) |
Madison Brengle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Johanne Svendsen
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
44%
(
16 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
24 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Madison Brengle
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
43 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Madison Brengle
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
85%
(
39 of
46)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Madison Brengle
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Irina Khromacheva
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Madison Brengle
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
86%
(
49 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Su Jeong Jang
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Mary Stoiana
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(2) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
69 of
93)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Elina Avanesyan
71%
(
70 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
47%
(
33 of
70)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
52%
(
51 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Arantxa Rus
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
47 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Magdalena Frech
69%
(
87 of
126)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
117)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
59 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
117)
120
Total Points Won
123
|
4-6 7-6(8) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
50%
(
7 of
14)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
25
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Brengle Vs Serrano Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Brengle are available here and Serrano photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
